🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law may be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to approve a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," commented the MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, support built behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Apart from the West, other states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies take a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this global conversation continues, the actions of this nation and others indicate that states globally are no longer prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.