🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously backed the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.