🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on protagonists chasing after fresh starts, attempting to leave behind addictions or harmful partnerships, only to see hope turn into conflict. The author repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", making it deliberately jaded through its repetitions. Examples include "He could make a fresh start" and "They opted for a clean break" recur in the story. Meanwhile, she appears to be undertaking her own fresh start, because this presents as a novel form of writing – observational, truly literary. But then it proves to be laden with the same dilemmas and styles as her previous works.

From Chance Novelist to Iconic Work

Chris Kraus was originally an creative who entered the literary world almost accidentally with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, structured as letters to an unreceptive lover, converting confessional female writing from self-debasement into assassination. She continued writing, but the three subsequent fascinating and rebarbative novels missed the power and directness that the letter form infused into the narrative voice of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her position as a maverick maker who had turned into a extensive real estate holder, so there was considerable focus on property transactions. It makes sense that she now wants to try out fresh narrative sources, turning outward to other people's stories, at a period in which she asserts that current political era renders personal narrative unnecessary.

Several Eras, Collective Unavoidable Background

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, spanning multiple eras – all unable to escape their pasts. There is the tale of characters Emma and Jasper, based on her own mother and father, moving from the Bronx to rural Connecticut. There is the account of Kraus, in the character of protagonist Catt Greene, grappling with the late recognition of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her partner struggling with addiction a man named Paul. And there is the narrative of a homicide of one directionless individual by another in a community long abandoned by liberal ideals only a brief drive from Catt's cottage in a remote part of Minnesota.

From my perspective as a reader drawn to honed writing of the kind the author herself typically rejects, I was captivated by the literary tone of the initial segment.

As a reader drawn to crafted language of the style that Kraus tends to eschew, I was captivated by the storytelling approach of the initial part. It exhibits a novel degree of detail that accommodates small details, like the pail that the young Catt frees from the ice at the opening of the book, helped by her cherished parent. "Look, an ice toy!" she exclaims; "a great plaything", he responds, "the nuanced interpretations of terms circulating in their speech like hard candy". She tells Emma's story with interest and closeness. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream – not entirely her own."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was fated to feel let down when I expected this fresh tone could continue through the novel. The author states here that she resents the satisfaction audiences such as myself have taken from I Love Dick; she's committed to disruption, to the messy artistic approach she has in common with her hero writer Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her previous novels reasserts itself in the central part. Catt is working on refurbishing 36 run-down apartments in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while moving between the Midwest and the West Coast, unsuccessful in assisting Paul curb his addiction. She is overwhelmed as Paul cycles through low-resource employment as an substance abuse counselor in a society driven by the rage and anxiety that drives Trump's victory. A significant portion discusses about Catt being cancelled on social media, her professional designation altered from "writer" to "landlord" on a reference site. Kraus still seems to invest excessive emotion about this. On one occasion she says that she's investigating the murder so that before leaving Minnesota, "she could potentially understand something about an America that her social media opponents would be unable to grasp, would overlook entirely".

The Murder Narrative

Thus we arrive to the murder itself – and the referenced day spent by the victim with the murderer and his companions. Kraus has great source material, and details moment by moment what occurred as the victim Brandon came to meet Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He anticipated intimacy but appears congenially to have passed the day in the company of her associates, wandering about having his vehicle repaired and paying for snacks and drugs, before being shot by her romantic interest Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has frequently been hospitalised for violent rage.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

Catt develops an obsession by the narrative, and I found myself captivated by the way that her twin drives towards responsible documentation and audacious rule-breaking clash in this segment. However, I would have preferred her to go further into her own obsessions here. The standout figure is Brittney herself, who comes alive partly through Catt seeing herself in her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman derailing in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus tells us that Catt converses with Brittney in prison, but she doesn't dramatise these conversations. This entire part feels oddly unfinished, to the degree that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par